WILD

Heart of the global wilderness conservation movement.

  • Home
  • Our Vision
    • About
    • History
    • Nature Needs Half
  • How we work
    • Action
    • Publishing & Arts
    • Convening
    • Policy & Management
    • Intergenerational
    • Training & Capacity Building
  • Where we work
    • Wild Africa
    • Wild Asia
    • WILD Europe
    • Wild Latin America
    • Mind & Heart
    • Wild North America
  • World Wilderness Congress
    • History
    • Accomplishments
    • WWC Chronicles
    • WWC Publication Archive
  • WILD Interactive
    • Blog
    • E-leaf Newsletter
    • Forum
    • Multimedia
  • Support WILD
    • Donate
    • Finances & Effectiveness
    • Creative Ways to Give
    • Legacy Giving
    • Publications & Gear Store
    • Contact Us
  • DONATE NOW
Subscribe

by RSS by Email


Connect with WILD

Facebook MySpace YouTube Twitter


Join Email List
For Email Marketing you can trust

Back to WILD Blog

About

Learn More about our Blog, and who’s behind it.

Categories
  • Books, Magazines & Other Publications
  • Climate Change
  • Communications & Media
  • Field Notes
  • Ian Player Perspectives
  • Intergenerational Blog
  • Mali Elephant Blog
  • Native People & Traditional Cultures
  • Nomkhubulwane Blog
  • PhotoBlogs
  • Policy & Politics
  • Wilderness Designations
  • Wilderness Experience
  • Wildlife
  • WWC

New Bill for Carbon-Caps, but not Protecting Wild-Nature

June 30,2009 by Emily Loose


As you’ve likely heard, the US House of Representatives passed the first comprehensive climate and energy bill last week. The “American Clean Energy and Security Act” shows that the US is setting up to the climate change plate, as are many countries in preparation for December’s UNFCCC summit in Copenhagen. The bill now moves to the Senate, and then onto President Obama’s desk.

In a nut shell, it is a cap-and-trade bill, but has some mention of preventing deforestation as methods to reduce carbon emissions. The bill mandates that 15% of US electricity come from renewable sources (wind, solar, etc) by 2020.  The plan sets provisions for smart grids, energy savings for industries, appliances and buildings, investments in clean energy technologies…but relatively no mention about stopping the destruction of wild-nature (responsible for 20-25% of all greenhouse gas emissions).  While renewable energy, emissions capping and the like are extremely important – when will our leaders pay attention to the mass amounts of carbon released from destroying wild-nature?  If we’re only talking about solar panels and wind-turbines, are we missing the easiest answer?  Protecting wild-nature can drastically reduce emissions with very minimal impacts on the tax-payer!

  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
Posted in: Climate Change, Talking WILD
Comments: 0 (Post Comment)

Post your Comment here





Comments are the sole responsibility of their authors. WILD is not responsible, nor will be held liable, for blog comments. WILD reserves the right to delete any comment that is abusive, profane, rude, or considered spam.



Copyright Disclaimer Privacy Statement Bylaws & Articles of Incorporation Terms of Use Contact Us Site Map

We give special thanks to the numerous professional and amateur photographers, many of them from the International League of Conservation Photographers, who generously donate the use of their images. © 2003 – 2012 The WILD Foundation